If My Team Can't Remember the Last Win That Mattered, What Does That Cost Me?

Time moves differently when you're not watching it. You chain the weeks together, one into the next, and somewhere around month four or five you look up and realize you can't quite account for where you've been. You used to think that was age. Or pace. Or just the cost of doing a lot.

Maybe it's something else.

Some of us pause at mid-year. Companies do it too — semester reviews, retrospectives, all-hands, quarterly check-ins. The structure exists. The calendar holds the date. Someone books the room.

Call it a ritual. Except most of the time, it isn't one.

Byung-Chul Han — Korean-German philosopher — makes a distinction worth sitting with. A routine optimizes. A ritual marks. Brushing your teeth is a routine. A Sunday lunch that actually matters, a moment of silence held deliberately, a quarterly gathering where people look each other in the eye and say this is what I'm carrying — those are rituals. The difference is whether the moment leaves an internal trace.

His argument: we've lost the slow, long forms of attention that rituals require. Without them, time loses texture. No grip. We live more and remember less.

A French philosopher puts a sharper point on it. We've replaced rituals with permanent connection. Everything continuous, instant, available. The structure that used to hold time in place — the slow Sunday, the shop that was closed, the meeting that couldn't happen because the technology didn't exist — that's gone. The smoothness compounds.

There's something to add to that.

The problem isn't only that we stopped building rituals. It's that we stopped accumulating ourselves in the process. Without markers, you do things but you don't quite become someone in the meantime. You deliver a quarter, ship a product, hit a target — and six months later you look back and wonder if you were actually there for any of it.

Now bring AI into this.

Think about a leader — call her Claire — running her mid-year review. The deck is polished. The numbers are there. AI helped her team move faster through the first half of the year. More output, faster turnaround, fewer bottlenecks. The efficiency was real.

She looks around the room and asks: what do we remember from this year so far?

The team looks at the metrics. The metrics look back.

Nobody can name the moment. The win that felt like something. The problem they wrestled with together and came out the other side. The conversation that shifted something. Those things happened — the task list confirms it. But somewhere between the output and the review, the texture disappeared.

Claire recognizes something. The mid-year review was supposed to be a ritual. A marker. The moment the team looks up from the work and says — we did that, together, and it meant something. Instead it became a reporting exercise. Efficient. Thorough. Forgettable.

AI didn't cause this. But it accelerated the conditions that made it possible.

‍

When the pace never slows enough for anything to leave a mark — when every friction point gets smoothed before it has a chance to become a memory — the ritual keeps its shape but loses its function.

The promise of AI is efficiency. And it delivers. But if the baseline is always moving — if there's always more that could be done because the tools make it possible — the pull toward the next thing gets stronger. The routine never changes because it's always optimized. When nothing creates friction, nothing creates a marker either.

AI doesn't steal rituals. But it makes the choice to have them more deliberate than it's ever been.

This matters more now. A generation ago, rituals were partly enforced by the structure of life. The slow Sunday. The shop that was closed. The meeting that couldn't happen because the technology didn't exist. Now the technology always exists. The shop is always open. The message can always be sent.

The ritual has to be chosen. Every time. On purpose.

Which means the mid-year review Claire runs next time doesn't have to be longer. It doesn't have to be slower. It has to ask a different question. The task list tells you what the team did. The ritual asks what it meant. What they'll carry. What they built together that they can actually see themselves in.

Memory is how we know we exist. Erode that — even gradually, through accumulated smoothness — and people don't become less efficient. They become less present to their own work. Less able to access what made them want to do it in the first place.

What will your team actually remember from this year?